Comments on: Spotify Updates – Version 0.3.17 http://pansentient.com/2009/06/spotify-updates-version-0-3-17/ Tue, 15 May 2012 07:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: spotinews http://pansentient.com/2009/06/spotify-updates-version-0-3-17/comment-page-1/#comment-135 spotinews Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:33:54 +0000 http://s119572668.websitehome.co.uk/blog/?p=131#comment-135 to anonymous #2: I assume you have reported that album to Spotify. With 3,5 millions tracks it's very likely that they have recieved some bad ones.<br /><br />I'm really looking forward to the high bitrate. Latest I heard was that it will go live on Friday. to anonymous #2: I assume you have reported that album to Spotify. With 3,5 millions tracks it's very likely that they have recieved some bad ones.

I'm really looking forward to the high bitrate. Latest I heard was that it will go live on Friday.

]]> By: Anonymous http://pansentient.com/2009/06/spotify-updates-version-0-3-17/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Anonymous Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:21:02 +0000 http://s119572668.websitehome.co.uk/blog/?p=131#comment-134 I'd rather they correct quality problems with sources than use q9.<br /><br />This track (and others on this album) have glitches:<br /><br />http://open.spotify.com/track/4usxwFUw6DCbPicDd0mLAj I'd rather they correct quality problems with sources than use q9.

This track (and others on this album) have glitches:

http://open.spotify.com/track/4usxwFUw6DCbPicDd0mLAj

]]> By: Anonymous http://pansentient.com/2009/06/spotify-updates-version-0-3-17/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Anonymous Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:10:58 +0000 http://s119572668.websitehome.co.uk/blog/?p=131#comment-133 It double's the bitrate (and possibly the bandwidth costs ...), but not the quality. What the point of q9 anyway? How many people could even tell that the current q5 tracks are lossily encoded if they didn't *know* that they are?<br /><br />I would appreciate a drop in the premium price a lot more than this q9 thing. It double's the bitrate (and possibly the bandwidth costs …), but not the quality. What the point of q9 anyway? How many people could even tell that the current q5 tracks are lossily encoded if they didn't *know* that they are?

I would appreciate a drop in the premium price a lot more than this q9 thing.

]]>